Thứ Hai, 14 tháng 2, 2022

What Are New Conditions on Real Estate Purchase and Sale in 2022? | ANT Lawyers






Real estate business activities have a great influence on socio-economic development. Accordingly, in order to ensure the legal framework for the current real estate business activities, the Government has issued Decree 02/2022/ND-CP detailing the implementation of a number of articles of the Law on Real Estate Business (“Decree 02/2022/ND-CP”) in order to promptly amend and supplement inadequate regulations to be consistent with reality. In which, conditions for the transfer of contracts of purchase and sale, lease-purchase of houses and construction works are mentioned.

The demand for the transfer of purchase and sale contracts, lease-purchase of houses, real estate, construction works on the market is at a high level, although there are no regulations on the transfer of contracts for the sale of non-residential real estate not to be formed in the future. Therefore, there is no legal basis to carry out these transactions in reality. Therefore, Decree 02/2022/ND-CP has had a number of amendments and supplements and has overcome some limitations compared to the past, which is expected to solve problems and inadequacies.

Accordingly, Decree 02/2022/ND-CP has combined conditions for transfer of contracts for purchase and sale of future houses and conditions for transfer of lease-purchase contracts for existing houses and construction works with specific regulations.

Firstly, the transfer of the contract requires a purchase and sale contract or a lease purchase contract made in accordance with regulations. Accordingly, these contracts must ensure compliance with the provisions of the transfer agreement form for each transferred real estate object, whether it is a Contract for Sale, Purchase, Lease and Purchase of an apartment, or tourist apartments (Condotel), office apartments combined with accommodation (Officetel)… are valid and allowed to be used for transfer. In addition, for cases where the parties have signed a contract before the effective date of Decree 02/2022/ND-CP, the signed contract must be present. Therefore, when transferring these types of contracts, the parties should pay attention to ensure the legality of the respective contract in terms of form and time of establishment.

Secondly, the transfer contract must be in the category that has not yet submitted a dossier to request a competent state agency to issue a certificate of land use rights, ownership of houses and other land-attached assets. This provision has been mentioned in the previous regulations for the transfer of real estate contracts formed in the future. Up to now, this is still a necessary regulation to ensure that the handling of licensing procedures does not overlap, eliminating the risk that a real estate bears two or more certificates for the same object.

Thirdly, the contract of sale, purchase, lease-purchase of houses and construction works must be free of disputes and lawsuits. Accordingly, the disputed contract will not be used to transfer to a third party. This provision is consistent with the provisions on prohibition of transferring property rights to the disputed property. Therefore, in order to transfer the contract, the parties need to settle the dispute in advance to have a basis for the transfer of the contract. In many complicated cases, the real estate dispute lawyers need to be consulted for proper dispute solutions.

Fourthly, houses and construction works that are the subject of purchase and sale or lease-purchase contracts must not be subject to distraint or mortgage to secure the performance of obligations as prescribed by law. Recently, the phenomenon of transferring these contracts has increased with seriously violated the provisions of the law, making it difficult for relevant competent authority to handle, otherwise causing damages to the transferee without understanding the legal issues for the transferor in the contract. However, with the principle of respecting the agreement of the parties, the law still allows the assignment of the contract in this case if the mortgagee agrees and this consent must be recorded specifically to avoid disputes later.

It can be seen that the highlight of Decree 02/2022/ND-CP has initially solved the inadequacies in the transfer contract for tourist apartments (Condotel), office apartments (Officetel) that help relevant competent authority have a legal basis to handle the requirements. Further, Decree 02/2022/ND-CP has contributed to building a clearer mechanism so that the participants can actively comply with regulations on effective real estate business contracts, minimizing the contract disputes in Vietnam, creating a safer and more sustainable real estate market in Vietnam.

Thứ Năm, 10 tháng 2, 2022

What Are Regulation for Automatic Conviction Expungement? | ANT Lawyers





In order to show the spirit of humanity, create conditions for those who have been convicted to reintegrate into the community and stabilize their lives, the Vietnam Penal Code has built a system to automatically have criminal records in Vietnam removed. Accordingly, former convicted persons who have met the prescribed conditions will be considered as unconvicted and they will not have to continue to bear any consequences due to their former convictions. However, the implementation of regulations on the issue of automatically expunging criminal records in practice encounters a number of difficulties and problems.



It can be seen that, the need for recognition of criminal record removal is very obvious. Remission of criminal records will show a more positive recognition of the law for people who have been convicted of crimes and facilitate their participation in work and encourage them to quickly integrate into life. In the case of automatic conviction expungement, there are a number of changes that the former convicts should pay attention.

The natural condition of automatic conviction expungement.

In order to be automatically expunged, a convicted person must satisfy the conditions for automatic criminal record remission according to the provisions of the Penal Code. Accordingly, a person who has been convicted must satisfy the following conditions: (i) have fully served the legally effective conviction of the court or the statute of limitations for judgment enforcement, including the principal penalty, has expired. and additional penalties (fines, damages, court fees…); (ii) not to commit a new offense within the prescribed time limit. These are the basic conditions proving that the former convicted person has fulfilled all the obligations for his/her offense.

The implementation procedure, if an individual who has been convicted has a request for a certificate of criminal record remission.

Accordingly, the agency competent to handle the case is the agency that manages the judicial record database. Therefore, the National Center for Criminal Records – the Ministry of Justice will guide the Department of Justice to directly regulate the Detailed procedures to clear criminal records for cases where criminal convictions are automatically cleared. Individuals who wish to carry out the procedure of automatically expunging their criminal records will only need to prepare a set of documents requesting the issuance of a criminal record card and submit it to the Judicial Records Center or the Department of Justice of a province/ city where convicted person is a residence without having to provide any other documents. After receiving the dossier, the agency managing the judicial record database will be responsible for verifying the automatic conditions for criminal record remission and issuing a criminal record card confirming “no criminal record” if the individual has no criminal record eligible individuals as prescribed by law. Therefore, the provisions of the 2015 Penal Code on criminal record remission have naturally created more favorable and flexible conditions for individuals who have been convicted than in the previous procedure.

Regarding the verification of information about former convicts, the Department of Justice will send a written request for verification to the commune-level People’s Committee or the agency or organization where the convict resides and works after serving the sentence about whether that person is prosecuted, investigated, prosecuted or tried during the criminal conviction period. Commune-level People’s Committees and agencies and organizations will send a written notice of verification results to the Department of Justice. After receiving the written notification of verification results from the commune-level People’s Committees, agencies and organizations, the Department of Justice will handle criminal record remission for citizens.

Contrary to the previous regulations that the court will be the authority to issue a certificate of automatically expunging criminal records for convicts. According to current regulations, the authority belongs to the agency managing the judicial updates database information on the convict’s criminal history and, upon request, issue a judicial record card certifying that he or she has no previous criminal record, if all conditions are met. However, in reality, sometimes the current national database might not be synchronous. Therefore, when a convicted person requests for a judicial record card, the agency managing the judicial record database must take time to coordinate with relevant agencies such as the court, the procuracy, and the public prosecutor’s office… to verify the natural condition to delete the criminal record, which takes much time.

Therefore, at present, the confirmation of criminal record remission for the case of automatically expunging criminal records remission has specific regulations, but the implementation still faces many difficulties and complications affecting the interests of the requester. Hence individuals who have been convicted must keep relevant papers and documents to easily prove their claims are legal and save time and costs. The individual could authorize a law firm to help with criminal record procedures in Vietnam.

Thứ Tư, 9 tháng 2, 2022

What Are Challenges in Debt Recovery Litigation Procedures for Enterprise? | ANT Lawyers

In the operation of the enterprises, the arising of bad debts could be unavoidable. However, in order to be able to file lawsuit and collect debts and minimize bad debts in practice, there are still many difficulties. Currently, the process of debt recovery according to the provisions of the law still encounter many problems and shortcomings, while enterprises need more effective solutions to recover debts fully and quickly in order to ensure revenue and financial balance for enterprise.

In order to be able to recover debts according to the provisions of the law, enterprises could hire dispute lawyers or by themselves must go through two stages with relatively complicated procedures. Accordingly, the lawsuit need to be filed and after the court’s judgment, the enterprise needs to file a petition for civil judgment enforcement. Because, the trial stage and the judgment execution phase are two independent stages, each with a different process.



First, the stage of lawsuits in court. When the enterprise’s interests are infringed, the enterprise will need to file a lawsuit at a competent court. This is a traditional method of lawsuits that forces enterprise to comply with the court’s strict processes and procedures and relevant legal regulations.

Specifically, in order to initiate a lawsuit at the court, an enterprise must meet the following conditions to initiate a lawsuit: (i) there is a debt incurred and the debtor fails to pay the debt as committed, leading to a dispute and the enterprise believes that rights and interests are infringed; (ii) the dispute between the enterprise and the debtor in this case must fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the court, not under the jurisdiction of any other agency or organization (arbitration); (iii) in some cases, if there is an agreement or is required by law to carry out pre-litigation procedures such as conciliation, negotiation, notification, etc., the enterprise must complete such procedures before requesting a competent court to settle disputes between the enterprise and the debtor. In addition, in the petition, the enterprise needs to enclose invoices, vouchers and loan documents to prove that the debt collection is grounded. These are the basic conditions that enterprise need to keep in mind when filing a lawsuit to ensure that the petition is valid and not returned.

After the petition is accepted and the enterprise completes the payment of the court fee advance, the court will conduct verification and collect evidences; conducting meetings, checking the handover, accessing and disclosing evidences and conciliation. In case the involved parties cannot reconcile with each other on the payment plan or agree on interest and debt, the court will bring the case to trial. During this period, enterprises need to consider late payment interest, principal and debtor’s financial situation in order for request to be accepted by the court and serve as a basis for possible judgment enforcement.

Second, the procedure for requesting judgment enforcement. After the judgment or decision of the court takes legal effect, it must be respected by organizations and all citizens. Accordingly, enterprises, especially debtors, within the scope of their responsibilities, should strictly abide by judgments and decisions and must take responsibility before law for judgment enforcement. Within 5 years from the date the judgment or decision takes legal effect, the creditor can by himself or authorize another person or dispute law law firm to make a written request for judgment enforcement and send it to the district-level judgment enforcement agency where the court is located for first-instance trial court to request judgment enforcement. Accordingly, enterprises need to prepare a written request for judgment enforcement together with the judgment or decision requested for enforcement and other relevant documents. For the extent of the petition for judgment enforcement, the enterprise needs to show information about the debtor’s assets or judgment enforcement conditions.

In addition, enterprises have the right to request civil judgment enforcement agencies to apply measures to secure judgment enforcement, including: freezing of accounts, temporary seizure of assets and papers, temporary suspension of registration, transfer, etc. change the current state of assets to avoid the debtor’s dispersal of assets and inability to repay the debt according to the judgment. At the same time, the judgment enforcement agency will issue a notice of judgment enforcement, setting a time limit for the debtor to voluntarily execute the judgment of 15 days from the date the debtor receives or is duly notified execution decision. At the end of the above-mentioned voluntary time limit, the debtor who has conditions for judgment enforcement but does not voluntarily execute the judgment will be subject to coercion.

The enforcement of money assets will be applied by the judgment enforcement agency one of the measures such as deducting money from the account; subtract from the judgment debtor’s income, collect money from the judgment debtor’s enterprise activities; collect money from judgment debtors who are holding or collect money from judgment debtors who are kept by third parties or sell assets of judgment debtors to collect debts.

Although the judgments and decisions have taken effect, the initiation of lawsuits and judgment enforcement in many cases still cannot be enforced and the enterprise can debt recovery is challenging.

One is the determination of the debtor’s address for the court to serve the documents. The debtor always tends to evade and not cooperate, i.e. constantly changing addresses and causing difficulties for the court in the process of settling the case. Accordingly, the court could not proceed to serve the debtor, then some courts have decided to return the petition to the claimant, or suspend the case because it considers that there are not enough conditions to initiate a lawsuit or not summon the defendant. This is one of the main factors causing delays in the legal process when enterprises initiate lawsuits.

The second is the application of trial procedure in absentia. In order to fully meet the conditions for trial in absentia, the court will take time and many measures to verify and post procedural documents according to regulations. Besides, for debt disputes with complicated elements, it takes more time to collect more documents and evidences, conduct solicitation of document expertise, etc. or the case has many people with interests and obligations related, the trial was adjourned several times. Therefore, the intangible interests of enterprises have been seriously affected.

Third is the execution process. In fact, many enterprises have had court judgments, but the judgment enforcement process has lasted for many years, and enterprise have not been able to recover their debts. This problem may arise from the lack of flexibility in the coordination between banks, other agencies and organizations and the judgment enforcement agency, which is detrimental to the verification and distraint of assets of the agency, directly affecting the time of judgment enforcement.

Fourth is for the distraint, auction of assets that are assets that are difficult to determine the value of, or properties that are in dispute or there are no auction participants are also reasons for the delay in debt recovery.

Fifth is due to human subjective factors. Specifically, due to opposing and uncooperative acts of changing the current status of mortgaged assets, obstructing the verification of judgment enforcement conditions, asset valuation, and asset auction. For movable property, the debtor could actively move or disperse in order to cause difficulties in the handling process. In addition, there are cases where enforcers violate the time limit for notifying or serving judgment enforcement decisions/notices, failing to conduct verification…

Hence, enterprises that wish to proceed debt recovery effectively need to proactively collect information, judgment execution conditions of the debtor and provide it to the judgment enforcement agency. Besides, it is necessary to seek the legal advice of law firm with experience in litigation and enforcement for debt recovery process in Vietnam.

Thứ Ba, 8 tháng 2, 2022

What Are Changes on Enterprise Registration According to Decree No. 01/2021/ND-CP? | ANT Lawyers



On January 4, 2021, the Government issued Decree No. 01/2021/ND-CP on enterprise registration.

From January 4, 2021, the following 04 procedures will be carried out in conjunction: Registration of establishment of enterprises, branches, representative offices in Vietnam; Labor usage declaration; Granting the number of the social insurance participant; Register to use invoices of the enterprise.

The enterprise code is also the enterprise’s taxpayer identification number and the unit participating in social insurance number of the enterprise. According to previous regulations, only the enterprise code was specified as the enterprise’s taxpayer identification number.



The Business Registration Office has the right to accept or reject the intended name for registration of the enterprise. The opinion of the Business Registration Office is the final decision to avoid the identical, mistaken enterprise name and violation of the regulations on enterprise naming. In case of disagreement with this decision, an enterprise may initiate a lawsuit in in Vietnam accordance with the law on administrative procedures.

In case an enterprise registers the date of business commencement after the date of being granted an enterprise registration certificate, the enterprise is entitled to do business from the date it is registered, except in the case of conditional business investment.

The person competent to sign the application for enterprise registration may authorize other organizations or individuals to carry out enterprise registration procedures. Authorized subjects may be individuals, organizations or non-public postal service providers or single service providers of public postal services. In case of authorizing a public postal service provider to carry out enterprise registration procedures, when carrying out enterprise registration procedures, postal staff must submit a copy of the application form according to the form provided by the operator. Public postal service providers to issue with certified signatures of postal staff and persons competent to sign written application for enterprise registration. In case of authorizing a non-public postal service provider to carry out enterprise registration procedures, the enterprise registration dossier must be accompanied by a copy of the service contract with the organization providing services to perform procedures related to enterprise registration, referral of that organization to the individual directly performing procedures related to enterprise registration and copies of legal papers of the individual introduce.

In addition, the Decree also stipulates that in addition to the way of paying fees and charges directly at the Business Registration Office, the fee payer can transfer money to the account of the Business Registration Office or use an electronic payment service. The enterprise registration fee is not refundable to an enterprise in the event that an enterprise is not granted an enterprise registration certificate. Online payment of fees and charges will also be supported on the National Business Registration Portal. However, the fee for using this service will not be included in the business registration fee, the fee for providing and disclosing information. In the event of an error in the electronic payment process, the fee or fee paying organization or individual should contact the service provider intermediary for settlement.

What Changes in Procedures for Granting Work Permits for Foreign Workers from 2021? | ANT Lawyers





Vietnam law allows enterprises, agencies, organizations, individuals and contractors to recruit foreign workers for job positions that Vietnamese workers cannot meet the needs of business operation in Vietnam. However, the procedures to apply for permit allowing foreign workers to work in Vietnam is complicated which many times labour lawyers could be engaged to help provide more productive solutions to avoid delay or dispute that lead to the negative impact to the rights and benefits of employer or employee.



A foreign employee means a person who hold a foreign nationality and is at last 18 years of age and has full legal capacity; has qualifications, occupational skills, practical experience and adequate health as prescribed by the Minister of Health; is not serving a sentence; does not have an unspent conviction; is not undergoing criminal prosecution under his/her home country’s law or Vietnam’s law; has a work permit granted by a competent authority of Vietnam, except in the cases the foreign employees are not required to have the work permit.

Job positions in which enterprises are employed by foreign workers include managers, executives, experts and technical workers.

Manager means a person in charge of management of an enterprise or the head or deputy head of an agency or organization.

Executive means the head or a person who directly administers affiliated entities of an agency, organization or enterprise.

Expert means a foreign worker who obtains at least a bachelor’s degree or equivalent and at least 03 years’ experience in his/her training field in corresponding with the job position/job assignment that he/she will be appointed in Vietnam; obtains at least 5 years’ experience and a practicing certificate in corresponding with the job position that he/she will be appointed in Vietnam; or falls under a special case subject to decision of the Prime Minister according to a request of the Ministry of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs.

Technical worker means a foreign worker who has been trained in technical field or another major for at least 01 year and have worked for at least 03 years in his/her training field; or obtains at least 5 years’ experience in corresponding with the job position that he/she will be appointed in Vietnam.

Before applying for a work permit for a foreign worker, at least 30 days before the date on which foreign workers are expected to be employed, the employer (except contractor) shall request to determine the demand for foreign workers for every job position for which Vietnamese workers are underqualified and send a corresponding report to the People’s Committee of province where the foreign workers are expected to work.

The People’s Committee of province shall issue a document specifying accepted job positions and non-accepted job positions within 10 working days after receiving the foregoing report on demand for foreign workers or report on change thereof.

At least 15 working days before the day on which a foreign worker starts to work, the employee shall submit an application for work permit to the Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs of the province where he/she is expected to work.

Within 5 working days after receiving a duly completed application, the Department of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs of province where the foreign worker is expected to work shall issue a work permit to the foreign worker. The form of work permit shall be solely printed and issued by the Ministry of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs. If the application is rejected, a written explanation is required.

After the foreign worker is issued with a work permit, the employer and the foreign worker must sign a written employment contract as per Vietnam’s labor law before the date on which the foreign worker is expected to work. The employer shall send that employment contract to the competent authority that issue that work permit. The employment contract is the original or a certified true copy.

In a number of cases, there are situation which employer engages a foreign employee in a job but fails to perform sufficient work permit procedures in time. When a labour dispute arise, it takes time to prove the labour relationship between the parties and this would negatively impact the right and benefits of the employee. It is therefore important to ensure the labour compliance from both employer and employee side to avoid dispute.

Chủ Nhật, 6 tháng 2, 2022

Extension of Answering the Questionnaire on Anti-dumping Case AD16 | ANT Lawyers






Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam issued the announcement on extension of the term of answering the official questionnaire on investigating the application of anti-dumping measures on some products of office desks and chairs originating from China and Malaysia (Case No. AD16).

On December 06th, 2021, the Trade Remedies Authority of Vietnam issued the official Questionnaire for the foreign manufacturers, exporters in the case No. AD16.

On January 05th, 2022, the Investigation agency extended the term of answer the questionnaire for the first time on January 26th, 2022.

According to Article 35.2 Decision No.10/2018/ND-CP on guidelines for the law on foreign trade management on trade remedies dated January 15th, 2018, within 30 days after receiving the investigation questionnaires, the concerned parties must provide written replies to all questions in the questionnaire. In case of necessity or there are written requests for extension with reasonable reasons from the concerned parties, the investigating authority may extend the time limit but not more than 30 days.

The Investigation agency extended the term of answering the questionnaire for the second time at 17:00 P.M on February 09th, 2022.

If Client needs any more information or request for legal advice or potential dispute regarding trade remedies measures including, anti-dumping, countervailing duty and safeguard measures or international trade dispute matters, our competition, anti-dumping, and countervailing duty lawyers of International trade and tax practice at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam always follow up anti-dumping cases and its development to update clients on regular basis.
Created By Sora Templates